• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Nottingham Women's Centre HomepageNottingham Women's Centre

  • About Us
    • Introduction
    • Our Impact
    • Our Herstory
    • Our Latest News
    • Nottingham Women’s Library
    • Trans Inclusion at NWC
    • Contact Us
    • Work with Us
    • Could you be our new trustee?
  • Find Support
    • What We Offer
    • Affordable Counselling
      • About Counselling at NWC
      • Українська терапевтична служба / Ukrainian Therapy Service
      • Counselling Placements
    • Advice, Guidance & Support
    • Courses & Activities
    • Women’s Justice Services
    • FREE legal advice drop-in sessions
  • Campaigns
    • Introduction
    • Campaign Updates
    • Misogyny Hate Crime
      • Misogyny Hate Crime Introduction
      • Misogyny Hate Crime – Nottingham’s story
      • Where Are We Now?
      • How to Report Misogyny Hate Crime
      • Misogyny Evaluation Report
    • Women’s Health Matters
      • Endometriosis in Nottingham
      • Menopause in the Workplace
        • Menopause in the Workplace: Introduction
        • Menopause: Information for Employees
        • Menopause: Information for Employers
        • Menopause Resources
  • Get Involved
    • Overview
    • Membership of Nottingham Women’s Library
    • Work with Us
    • Rooms for Hire
    • Fundraising & Donations
    • Volunteers
    • Women’s Organisations Network
    • Join Our Mailing List
  • Support Us
    • Fundraising & Donations
    • Our Funders
  • What’s On?
    • Events Calendar
    • Latest News
    • Join Our Mailing List
      • Newsletter Archive
  • Donate

Campaigning

#StopThe500 planned women’s prison places

18 August 2021

We’ve joined Women in Prison and many other representatives from housing, domestic abuse, criminal justice, midwifery, and children’s organisations in writing to Justice Secretary, Robert Buckland QC MP and Prisons Minister, Alex Chalk MP. This combined letter makes a clear case for community solutions instead of the proposed 500 new prison places.

It was published in the Sunday Times and warns about the rise of self-harm in prison as well as clearly refuting the Government’s claim that additional places are needed to prepare for a projected rise in the prison population due to the future hiring of more police officers.

We encourage you to write to the Justice Minister yourself and ask him to #Stopthe500 now. Read the letter in full here.

Call on the govt to #Stopthe500

Background on why we need to #Stopthe500

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is creating 500 extra prison places for women to “accommodate a growing prisoner population”, some of which will be built at Foston Hall in Derbyshire. The MoJ has predicted that the number of women prisoners is expected to rise by 40% over the next five years due to the recruitment of extra police officers and longer sentences.

This plan goes against the Government’s own Female Offender Strategy from 2018 which set out to reduce the women’s prison population, committing to shifting emphasis from custody to the community and envisaging more women being given non-custodial sentences as an alternative to prison. It also goes against the Government’s own evidence which has previously shown that prison is more likely to increase reoffending rather than reduce it and actually called for a reduction in the women’s prison population.


What we want to see instead

We would like to see a new model of funding for community-based women’s centres that provides support to women affected by the criminal justice system. We fully support The Case for Sustainable Funding for Women’s Centres report published by Women in Prison together with the Women’s Budget Group, The Nelson Trust, Together Women, Anawim and Brighton Women’s Centre.

The report asks that: “Central Government use the upcoming Spending Review to introduce a New Deal for Women’s Centres which should:

●        Provide core funding from central Government with a system of matched funding granted from a local consortium of commissioners.

●        Provide mandatory commissioning guidance to local commissioners to ensure a network of appropriate services is available nationwide.

Filed Under: Campaigning

‘Without Free Childcare It’s Impossible’ Campaigning Issues Paper – Summer 2021

5 August 2021

1. Struggling to access GP appointments in Nottingham

Case study

“I was really struggling with my mental health and having lots of panic attacks which were stopping me from working. Even though I really didn’t want to call my GP because I felt ashamed, I eventually built up the courage to reach out for help. However, when I did call, the receptionist said there was a month-long waiting list to get an appointment with the doctor which made everything so much worse.”  

Long waiting times

Case workers are reporting that women are waiting up to four weeks to see a doctor at their GP surgery in Nottingham city.

Online portal

Some GP practices have asked patients to book through an online portal, rather than booking over the phone. This has caused some women high levels of anxiety, which has been a barrier to accessing GP appointments. One of our clients has been unable to get a repeat prescription due to the new booking system and the anxiety it has caused her.

Online portals can also be a barrier to accessing appointment for women who:

●        Do not have the relevant digital skills. 22% of the UK’s population lacks basic digital skills.

●        Do not have access to Wi-Fi and/or digital devices. Half of households earning between £6000 – £10,000 do not have access to the internet at home and between 1 – 1.8 million families do not have access to a laptop, desktop or tablet at home.

●        Are not able to read and/or write in English. 16.4 % of adults in England have very poor literacy skills, which means they are unlikely to be able to fill out a form, read instructions or easily use the internet. Women who have English as a non-primary language (around 7% of UK population) may struggle to write or understand English easily, which may prevent them from using an online booking portal.

Call backs

GPs don’t give a specific time for ‘call backs’, which can be particularly difficult for women with work and caring responsibilities. Women have reported being forced to use annual leave to wait for a GP ‘call back’ to ensure they’re able to pick up the phone when the GP calls. Women with caring responsibilities have been unable to organise childcare without knowing the time of the call, which has resulted in women missing out on health care.

What NWC is doing about this issue

Our caseworkers can try to book appointments on behalf of clients, when feasible, but this is not a long-term solution. We can also signpost women to Nottinghamshire HealthWatch if they want to make a complaint about their experiences.

What change is needed at a policy level

  1. Specific times for ‘call backs’ to enable those with caring responsibilities to plan care

  2. Further investment in reception staff to enable women to call their GPs and book an appointment over the phone, which will avoid discrimination of those living in digital poverty and those with poor literacy.

  3. For Nottinghamshire CCG to monitor this issue and complete an equalities impact assessment regarding the move to online bookings and longer waiting times to access appointments.


2. Lack of specialist endometriosis clinic in Nottingham

Case study

“I was diagnosed with endometriosis in 2018 after suffering from cripplingly heavy periods, chronic pelvic pain and fatigue for over 12 years. The gynaecologist who diagnosed me did not have the special interest in endometriosis required by the NICE guidelines and told me that I had mild endometriosis which she had removed during my diagnostic surgery. This turned out to be a misdiagnosis I’ve now been diagnosed me with severe endometriosis, which requires a different level of treatment.

My second round of treatment has been delayed due to Covid. My symptoms are worsening all the time and I am now in constant pain. I have gained two stone and I am no longer able to run (due to pain from the endometrioma) which was something which was very beneficial for my mental as well as physical health. Because I rely on strong painkillers to get through the day, I am now opiate dependant and when I do have the surgery I am waiting for (assuming it is successful) I will need to go through an opiate withdrawal programme.

Because I have severe endometriosis, I have to be treated by a specialist endometriosis centre, however Nottingham does not have such a centre so I need to travel to Leicester for my care. This is also where my surgery will take place meaning it is unlikely that any friends or family will be able to visit me while I’m in hospital.” 

Background

1 in 10 (1.5 million) women suffer from endometriosis in the UK – a condition where tissue similar to the lining of the womb starts to grow in other places, such as the ovaries and fallopian tubes. It currently takes an average of eight years to get a diagnosis with endometriosis despite the fact that:

●        58% of those diagnosed had visited GP over 10 times

●        21% visited doctors in hospital over 10 times

●        53% visited A&E with symptoms

●        27% went to A&E more than three times

Nottingham

Several our staff and service users are suffering due to the lack of a specialist NHS endometriosis clinic in Nottingham. Women are being forced to travel to Leicester, Peterborough, Birmingham, and other parts of the country for treatment. This is particularly difficult for women with caring responsibilities and those who do not have cars. Women who access social security can claim back travel costs, but women on low wages cannot claim financial support for travel.

We ran a poll through our social media platforms and found that 45% of respondents with endometriosis (7 out of 15 women) said they had to travel to other parts of the country for treatment. Women unanimously agreed that it was “extremely important” that Nottingham gets a specialist endometriosis treatment centre through NHS.

Lack of appropriate and timely treatment can have a serious impact on women’s mental health and has been linked to painkiller addiction. 90% of the women we polled with endometriosis said they would have liked psychological support, but they have not been offered this as part of their treatment.

What is NWC doing about this?

We will continue to raise awareness about endometriosis by sharing information about the condition on our social media channels and we will consider becoming an Endometriosis Friendly Employer.

What we want changed at a policy level

1)      We want to see the funding allocated for a specialist endometriosis clinic in Nottingham. There are an estimated 16,000 women who suffer with endometriosis in the city.

2)      As outlined in NICE Guidelines, we want anybody who is suspected to be suffering from endometriosis should be seen by a gynaecologist who has a special interest in endometriosis (i.e. specialist training). We have learnt there are currently no gynaecologists with a special interest in endometriosis in Nottingham.

3)      Better training and more awareness about endometriosis in Nottingham’s GP practises.

4)      Free psychological support for women suffering from endometriosis.


3. Unaffordable childcare provision forcing women out of the workplace

“Before I started getting the free hours when my boys turned three, basically all my wages went on childcare” – A woman from Nottingham

Background

Unaffordable childcare is a key issue that’s been raised multiple times by our service users and staff. Most UK Government spending is targeted at preschool age (3-4 years) which has been shown to limit women’s ability to stay in work after giving birth. England is also one of the most expensive places in the world for childcare (only Japan is more expensive in terms of percentage of household income) with the average cost of a full-time nursery place at £263 a week, which is over half of average wage.

More recently, parents have been unable to work when their child is sent home from school due to a Covid case. Employers have no legal obligation to pay their staff in these circumstances, which means parents have been losing two weeks income in these circumstances. This can quickly push single parents into a financial crisis.

Nottingham

We surveyed 55 women about their experiences of motherhood, childcare and work and found:

●        75% of women said the cost of childcare affects the amount they can work

●        53% of women reported that the pandemic has increased the negative impacts of unaffordable childcare

●        25% of women said they have been affected by redundancy/furlough because of childcare issues

Research by Pregnant then Screwed found that 15% of mothers have either been made redundant or expect to be made redundant since the pandemic and of those, 46% have said that a lack of childcare provision played a role in their redundancy. They also found that 72% of mothers have been forced to work fewer hours because of childcare issues, and 65% of mothers who have been furloughed say a lack of childcare was the reason.

Women told us:

●        “One of us has to work part time so that we only use the free hours, but we didn’t get any when one of us couldn’t work”

●        “I was part time and freelance. Returning to work was hard as you pay even if you have no work booked.”

●        “Childcare costs should be subsidised, but workplaces also need to offer flexibility.”

●        “I decided not to go back to work after maternity leave as I would have been getting so little money after childcare costs.”

●        “It’s due to the free hours (now she’s 3) that it’s not affecting me financially right now”

●        “It’s impossible”

What is NWC doing about this?

NWC used to run an affordable childcare crèche but unfortunately this had to close due to funding restraints.

What we want changed at a policy level

1)      Free full-time childcare from 6 months

2)      Track and trace isolation grant for parents. Gingerbread and Pregnant then Screwed are calling on the government to extend the Track and Trace isolation grant of £500 to parents who are unable to work when their child is sent home from school due to Coronavirus. There is a petition calling this – https://www.change.org/p/rishi-sunak-mp-parent-isolation-grant

3)      An independent review of childcare funding and affordability. There is a petition calling for this –  https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/586700


4. Putting more women in prison

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is creating 500 extra prison places for women to “accommodate a growing prisoner population”, some of which will be built at Foston Hall in Derbyshire. MoJ has predicted that the number of women prisoners is expected to rise by 40% over the next five years due to the recruitment of extra police officers and longer sentences.

This plan goes against the Government’s own female offender strategy which envisages more women being given non-custodial sentences as an alternative to prison. It also goes against the Government’s own evidence which has previously shown that prison is more likely to increase reoffending rather than reduce it and actually called for a reduction in the women’s prison population.[1]

What NWC is doing about this issue

We believe prison tears families and communities apart. We’ve joined Women in Prison and many other representatives from housing, domestic abuse, criminal justice, midwifery, and children’s organisations in writing to Justice Secretary, Robert Buckland QC MP and Prisons Minister, Alex Chalk MP. This combined letter makes a clear case for community solutions instead. It was published in the Sunday Times and also warns about the rise of self-harm in prison. It also clearly refutes the Government’s claim that additional places are needed to prepare for a projected rise in the prison population due to the future hiring of more police officers.

We are also circulating a letter template link on our social media and across our networks encouraging more people to write to the Justice Minister to ask him to #Stopthe500 now.

To read the letter in full click here.

What we want changed at a policy level

We would like to see a new model of funding for community-based women’s centres that provides support to women affected by the criminal justice system. We fully support The Case for Sustainable Funding for Women’s Centres report published by Women in Prison together with the Women’s Budget Group, The Nelson Trust, Together Women, Anawim and Brighton Women’s Centre.

The report asks that: “Central Government use the upcoming Spending Review to introduce a New Deal for Women’s Centres which should:

●        Provide core funding from central Government with a system of matched funding granted from a local consortium of commissioners.

●        Provide mandatory commissioning guidance to local commissioners to ensure a network of appropriate services is available nationwide.

[1] *”In 2018 the Ministry of Justice launched the Female Offender Strategy which set out to reduce the women’s prison population, committing to shifting emphasis from custody to the community, and as part of this abandoning plans to build five new Community Prisons for Women previously announced in 2016.” Women in Prison, July 2021


Who we are

Nottingham Women’s Centre is a charity and community space that empowers women by providing financial and employment support, counselling, training and campaigning in a women-only building in central Nottingham. Our staff and volunteers support around 250 women a week. We know from our work that the pandemic has been a difficult time for everyone but it’s been especially hard for women who were already struggling with their mental health, poverty or discrimination. 

Our quarterly Issues Papers outline some of the issues impacting our service users that have been highlighted by our caseworkers and management team. We send this anonymised information to a wide range of decision makers, such as Nottingham’s MPs and Leader of the Council, with the aim of creating change in partnership with other stakeholders. 

If you have any questions or feedback, or would like to be added to the Issues Paper distribution list, please email our Policy and Influencing Officer – katie@nottinghamwomenscentre.com

Filed Under: Campaigning, Issues Papers

PCC Candidates answer our Questions on Women’s Safety

22 April 2021

In light of the tragic events surrounding the murder of Sarah Everard and others; the #everyonesinvited campaign about sexual abuse and harassment in schools; and the Domestic Abuse Bill currently making its way through Parliament, we got together with Equation, Juno Women’s Aid, Nottingham Sexual Violence Support Services and Broxtowe Women’s Project, to write to all of the candidates of Nottinghamshire’s Police and Crime Commissioner election with a series of questions.

You can see a copy of the full letter we sent in full to Caroline Henry (Conservative candidate), Paddy Tipping (Labour candidate) and David Watts (Liberal Democrat candidate) here.

Below, you’ll find the responses we got back to every question from each candidate. We are publishing these so that women in Nottinghamshire can make an informed decision when they go to vote in the Nottinghamshire Police and Crime Commissioner election on Thursday May 6th.


1. Reducing sexual crimes

“How would you help to reduce sexual crimes and help to increase Rape convictions?”

Asked by Nottinghamshire Sexual Violence Support Services


Caroline Henry: “My plan to increase rape convictions is twofold: firstly, I will ensure Detective Constables in Nottinghamshire undertake training on the Achieving Best Evidence Guidance; secondly, I will work with local leaders across Nottinghamshire to develop an education package to teach young people about respect and consent.

I truly believe training on implementing the Achieving Best Evidence Guidance will allow those interviewing vulnerable witnesses, such as victims of rape, to get the best possible evidence to submit during legal proceedings, thus resulting in more rape convictions. I know elsewhere in the country Detective Constables receive additional training on how to implement the Achieving Best Evidence Guidance and I want to ensure we have the same here in Nottinghamshire.”

 

Paddy Tipping: “We know that across the country rape and sexual assault is often a hidden and underreported crime. I want to continue working with the specialist third sector and police in tackling these horrendous crimes. A key part of this is about changing attitudes and behaviour, healthy relationship training with young people is a cornerstone and is something I currently fund and commit to continuing to fund. 

Secondly is working to expand public understanding around these types of crime. The Consent Coalition is a group of organisations locally who are working together to raise awareness of the importance of consent, banish myths about rape and sexual violence and encourage survivors and victims to access support and report any sexual violence. My office is heavily involved in this work and again is something I fund. Finally is the work done with and by Nottinghamshire police to manage known offenders to ensure they are effectively managed and prevented from committing offences. Nationally there is a task and finish group working to the Prime Minister on rape convictions  and I’m pleased to be involved with it.” 

 

David Watts: “There are a number of steps that we need to take here. We need to encourage the prompt reporting of crimes. At the moment that still happens in far too few cases. We need to listen very carefully to what is making the experience of reporting and interacting with the system traumatic and address this, in particular ensure that reporting issues isn’t time consuming and ensure that a person is treated as an individual rather than that people working with them hold stereotypes.  One practical example is the police saying that they need to retain and examine the mobile phone of the victim to see what messages there are on there. Whilst there is a proper and necessary place for disclosure within the criminal justice system we need to consider the victims. Depriving someone of their phone for weeks or even months is simply not acceptable and I will be pushing for an early consideration of how we change this. (The easiest way is probably by cloning the phone so that the victim can have theirs back immediately and the police can still carry out the enquiries that they need to do.)

We also need to tackle some of the myths that are still put about in the media about the experience of victims in court. Many victims worry that their whole sexual background will be gone through in court, and this is what is still often suggested in soap operas and police dramas. The reality is that such behaviour was banned years ago. This all needs to be explained to the public so that victims don’t fear further trauma going through the legal system.

The first two options focus very much on the victim but we also need to look at the offenders. We need to deal rigorously with all perpetrators of violence and sexual violence. This includes where they first start, so that there is a zero tolerance attitude to sexual crime. If we can teach children when they are young what is wrong and what is right then they have more chance of remembering that. Where society engages in allowing sexual crimes under the guise of “high jinks, boys will be boys etc.” then we teach them the wrong message.

The incredibly low conviction rate for rapes remains a big worry. I do not support reducing the standard of proof required or requiring people to prove their innocence because I have seen no evidence that these would improve the quality of justice at all. What we do need to do is look carefully at how the police handle rape cases, and where a case does not result in a conviction there needs to be a rigorous review to determine what more could have been done. This must include identifying and attending to any errors made by the police. I’m old enough to remember a documentary about Thames Valley police where the victim of a rape was basically bullied and verbally abused by two police officers as she tried to report it. I do believe that we have moved on from then but there is still a long way to go. I absolutely will not engage in victim blaming.”


2. Improved support to make complaints

“How would you ensure that women have support to make complaints against the Police when necessary?”

Asked by Nottingham Women’s Centre


Caroline Henry: “I will ensure in my capacity as Police and Crime Commissioner a guaranteed response to complaints made against the police and a joined-up approach across police forces in Nottinghamshire to ensure complaints against the police are pursued to the full extent of the law.”

 

Paddy Tipping: “The Professional Standards Department has been reorganised and has a new female Superintendent in charge. Many of you will know her, and my Deputy Emma Foody has regular meetings to discuss any trends or issues with both her and the IOPC. Emma is willing to give any advice and support possible.  
 
Recently I have provided extra funding and worked with the Chief Constable to do a deep dive to better understand satisfaction rates with the Force by survivors. I am also grateful for the support provided by the specialist sector, both in supporting survivors with all their needs but also in having a relationship with my office which allows for a full and frank exchange of views which allows us and the Force to strive to be better.” 

 

David Watts: “I want to ensure that in every interaction with the police people are aware that they have the right to complain if necessary. There must be a regular review and monitoring of the process of complaint and what the basis of complaints are. As a councillor I get details of every complaint made against my council and what the outcome of that complaint is. I want to see that sort of monitoring of police complaints. My experience of supporting a number of clients through the police complaints system is that too often the officers tasked to deal with complaints see their role as protecting the police rather than getting to the heart of what went wrong. 

When I am teaching complaint handling, as I have done for a number of years, I encourage delegates to view every complaint as an opportunity to learn. The whole culture of handling complaints within the police needs to change. I recognise that this is a big job but I’m not afraid of big jobs.”


3. Funding for specialist services

“Will you commit to supporting local domestic and sexual violence services and lobby the government to secure long-term funding for specialist support for the most vulnerable in our communities?”

Asked by Juno Women’s Aid


Caroline Henry: “At our last Budget announcement an additional £19 million was announced specifically for tackling domestic abuse. This includes £15 million in 2021-22 across England and Wales to increase funding for perpetrator programmes that work with offenders to reduce the risk of abuse continuing. This is a fantastic commitment by the Government, but more can be done.

If elected PCC I will make sure to always stand up for those who need my help and support; as well as ensuring the Government continues to increase its funding to charities and organisations that support those suffering from domestic abuse.”

 

Paddy Tipping: “Violence against women and girls has always been a priority for me, I was involved is setting up the first Women’s Refuge in Nottinghamshire back in the 1970s. The funding for support services for domestic and sexual violence services has doubled. I’m particularly proud of the sexual violence service which was launched at the beginning of this year. The service was co-designed with partners and survivors. Building work on a new Sexual Assault Referral Centre (SARC) will start shortly.  

Earlier this month I wrote on behalf of all Police and Crime Commissioners to the Lord Chancellor making the case for sustainable long term funding. I also acknowledge, recognise and endorse the research that has been conducted by the sector nationally around the current underfunding of services, and commit to continuing to campaign for that cost to be met on a sustainable footing.”  

 

David Watts: “Yes. In fact I would like to do more than that. If elected I will implement research on work with perpetrators to reduce and prevent violence too. As I mentioned earlier I am all about evidence based policing and so looking at how we can prevent people offending in the first place is an important part of the work, as well as ensuring we properly protect and care for victims of crime.”


4. Support for minority groups

“How do you plan to support minority groups affected by domestic abuse such as male survivors, LGBTQ+ survivors, and BAME survivors whilst also supporting the need of female survivors?”

Asked by Equation


Caroline Henry: “Domestic violence sadly reaches all parts of our society and it is vital that when discussing ways to help all those who have and are suffering we include everyone in the conversation. So it is my belief that the support I give as PCC should be driven from discussions held by organisations and individuals who know better than anyone else the support that they need.”

 

Paddy Tipping: “My recently published VAWG strategy recognises the need for a gender informed approach to tackling domestic abuse. It also recognises the needs of individual communities are not monolithic and are both different and intersectional. Funding is available locally for a service for male survivors via Equation, and I am proud to have funded and supported the wider third sector to build links and trust as well as being responsive to the needs of different communities. I’m certainly not complacent, I recognise there is more work  to be done in this area going forward, as well as committing to developing that extra capacity in the specialist and wider third sector to deliver and meet the needs of communities.” 

 

David Watts: “I put this question to a friend of mine who is both LGBTQ+ and BAME, and who has spent much of her life working for minority rights both within government and the wider community. Her response was very simple and I’m not sure I can do better: “Fund services for them and ensure that there is parity of funding.” I can’t as a white straight male say that I know what the particular needs are of each group, but I can say that we will ensure that those who do know have the resources to provide those needs. I will also listen to the experience of minority groups so that I can start to understand.”


5. Training

“How will you ensure that robust, specialist training on domestic abuse is embedded within the Criminal Justice System to ensure that survivors are supported and prioritised?”

Asked by Broxtowe Women’s Project


Caroline Henry: “I am proud of the record the Conservative Party have in recognising domestic abuse. Not only is coercive and controlling behaviour now a crime, but crucially this week the Domestic Abuse Bill was passed – both legislative acts will have a profound effect on victims of domestic abuse and their experience with the Criminal Justice System.

As I have said time and time again in my campaign, I want to back victims not criminals. To do this, I will continue to develop relationships with women’s groups across Nottinghamshire that work tirelessly to support domestic abuse survivors and listen to them on how to further improve the experience of domestic abuse survivors within the Criminal Justice System.”

 

Paddy Tipping: “Ensuring an understanding of domestic abuse is key to supporting survivors in the Criminal Justice system, which is why I was disappointed to see the Government reject an amendment to the Domestic Abuse Bill that would have ensured all Family Court Judges received such training. I would urge them to reconsider.  

Nottinghamshire police were one of the first forces to provide Domestic Abuse matters training to all officers, and also delivers initial and refresher training for new recruits on domestic abuse. There are also regular discussions at the Regional Criminal Justice Board which Emma attends, where we strive to improve the system to further meet the needs of women.” 

 

David Watts: “An important part of this question is that it recognises that training is needed throughout the CJS and not just within the police. I would ensure that we develop or bring in an effective system which can be rolled out to the police, magistrates, judges and lawyers. I won’t be able to compel the latter groups to attend but I can negotiate and discuss with them the best way to encourage people to do so. 

All solicitors and barristers taking on cases with children now have to undergo specialist training before they do so, and there is no reason why this can’t be expanded to cover sexual assault cases and domestic violence cases as well. That would need to be negotiated with the Bar Standards Board and the Solicitors Regulation Authority and would need to be on a national scale, but there is no reason why the initiative for this cannot come from Nottinghamshire.”


6. Improving accountability

“How will police officers be held accountable for actions that aren’t in line with serving and protecting the community?”


Caroline Henry: “If elected PCC I will be tough on all crime no matter the perpetrator.  If a police officer commits a crime then they should be prosecuted to the full force of the law and I will make sure to enact this if elected.”

 

Paddy Tipping: “Both Nottinghamshire police and myself take a strong position on inappropriate behaviour by both officers and staff. It’s very important, happily it is rare and where it has happened we’ve taken action resulting in a number of officers have been dismissed.”

 

David Watts: “I’ve already spoken about the need to have an effective complaints process and this is another aspect of it. We need to look at the satisfaction of complainants with the outcomes of the complaints process. That will provide the data to assess how we are doing. I trained as a criminologist as well as a solicitor and I’m very aware that cold facts and figures can sometimes hide deeply troubling experiences, so whilst those figures are important I would want to assess them along with more detailed feedback from individual complainants.”


7. Reducing sexual harassment

“What measures are going to be put in place to ensure women feel safe on the streets of Nottinghamshire?”


Caroline Henry: “Over recent weeks, many women have shared their stories online regarding feeling unsafe on our streets and these have been both powerful and concerning. As a woman I related to so many of the fears and concerns held. The stories women shared from holding their keys between their fingers at night, to having their phone close to hand are far too familiar for many women, as well as myself.

Every woman in this country should feel safe to walk on our streets without fear of intimidation, harassment or violence. Changes to this will not be instant but I believe that there are changes that can be made. Making sure: that areas are properly lit, that police have a strong presence and that perpetrators are brought to justice, are just some of the measures I will focus on.”

 

Paddy Tipping: “I was delighted to work with the Women’s Centre and other partners to ensure Nottinghamshire Police were the first force to record misogyny as a hate crime back in 2016. We’ve continued to campaign together and made progress nationally. As this is about changing attitudes and behaviours, there is more to be done. I responded to the recent consultation by the Law Commission consultation strongly supporting the need for primary legislation in this area.  

Stalking for too long has been under recognised across the country. Nottinghamshire police have led in this area with the ‘Stalking Clinic’ where specialist officers come together to tackle incidents of this crime. Additionally I currently fund a specialist stalking support service to victims, a co-produced response with the specialist sector.   

I also want to make reference to the appalling events earlier this year in London with the tragic death of Sarah Everard. Although we don’t yet know the true details of what happened, we know there are too many incidents like it. I’m actively bidding for Safer Streets funding from the government for a range of measures to help women feel safer such as better lighting and CCTV. With partners more CCTV has been provided on the Forest. A review of CCTV provision across the city and county has recently been recommissioned. 

Women need to feel safe – we are on their side and we are on the case. Almost uniquely, we’ve worked with the leisure industry to provide better training for doorstaff. A number of venues have introduced “Club Crew” inside to provide support and security. We also work hard with venues and local partners on initiatives such as safe spaces and street pastors to provide women with more confidence when on a night out.”  

David Watts: “First I have to say that I’m delighted we already treat misogyny as a hate crime in Notts, and that other forces are following our initiative. I was dubious about whether this would work when it was first introduced by the police and I’m delighted to have been proved wrong.

In addition there are a number of practical steps that we need to take. The first and most obvious is to ensure that we have highly visible and supportive police day and night, so that women know that protection is there. I am very keen on community policing so every community knows who their local police are and where to contact them. Having officers on the beat and not just driving round in patrol cars helps make people feel safer. 

I am also very interested in developing “safe spaces” where people can go day and night and know that they will be able to find help and a place of safety. This might be something as simple as requesting a particular drink in a pub, with the bar staff recognising it as a code, or may on occasions need more. I support designing out crime, so when new developments are being built I encourage developers and planners to think about how you would feel walking through the area at night. Is it well lit? Is it overlooked by housing? etc. 

Finally we need to encourage women in particular to report crime, and there needs to be a detailed focus on the types of crime being reported, locations and times of day. This will give us the evidence about where problems are so that they can be tackled.

The England and Wales Crime Survey suggests that over half of all crimes are never reported to the police, often because the victim fears that they won’t be believed or that the police won’t take it seriously. This feeling is often right but it is an attitude in the police that we must change.


8. Addressing discrimination

‘“Do you believe there are any systemic or cultural issues at play within Nottinghamshire Police which affects the way they work with minority ethnic and working class communities?”


Caroline Henry: “If elected PCC I plan to work with our diverse community in Nottinghamshire to find out if there are any systemic or cultural issues at play within Nottinghamshire Police which affects the way they work with minority ethnic and working class communities. Personally my background is working class and my family is ethnically diverse. I will not hesitate to challenge any issues.”

 

Paddy Tipping: “Following the tragic death of Stephen Lawrence, I was involved in setting up the MacPherson inquiry. Since then some progress has been made but this remains a priority for me. The number of BAME officers has doubled over the last two years. 25% of all new recruits are from a BAME background. Nottinghamshire Police will be the first force in the country to have a workforce that reflects the community it serves.  
In addition, stop and search rates remain amongst the lowest in the country with the highest positive outcomes. I have an established process of talking with BAME communities.” 

 

David Watts: “Yes, every organisation has systemic and cultural issues. All do and I am determined to address these by listening to all minority, under represented, marginalised groups and their representatives and acting upon what I hear. I have zero tolerance for racism and want to challenge all other discriminatory behaviours and attitudes.”


9. Protecting women who defend themselves

“What will you do to protect women who defend themselves against abusive partners from being charged with assault?”


Caroline Henry: “There are several defences available, in law, to those who commit offences in circumstances connected with their involvement in an abusive relationship. This includes the full defence of self-defence. I do welcome the fact that the definition of domestic abuse in the Domestic Abuse Act should assist with clarifying the wide-ranging and malicious nature of domestic abuse and alerting all those involved in the criminal justice system to it. It is right that in any case, where it may be relevant, the defence of self-defence is fully examined.”

 

Paddy Tipping: “Charging decisions are taken by the Crown Prosecution Service rather than for me as PCC. We are however, all aware of the substantial interest across the criminal justice system of the position of women forced to defend themselves. This needs to be reflected in charging and sentencing decisions.” 

 

David Watts: “This is tricky as I do not believe the Police and Crime Commissioner should be involved in day to day operational police decisions, otherwise we really are politicising the police. What we need to change is the culture and approach of the police. Too often they begin with the assumption that everything is a crime, and that the winner must be the guilty party. This leads to women who have taken years of abuse and who snap and either injure or kill an abusive partner being treated throughout as the criminal. Changing the approach so that the police approach matters with a genuinely open mind would be a big step forward. In addition we need to review police procedures on these matters and ensure that they are carefully implemented. This includes ensuring that there is adequate provision of safe houses, safe spaces and provision for people liable to be assaulted.”


10. Policing Bill

“If you are elected, do you plan to make any changes to how protests in Nottinghamshire are policed in the context of the Policing Bill?”


Caroline Henry: “In order to ensure protests are policed according to the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, I will ensure the police are adequately equipped to manage highly disruptive protests. It is only right the police are able to manage protests in a necessary and proportionate way where protests have caused unjustifiable disruption and distress to other citizens – I will support the police in any way I can when police officers are exercising their lawful duty.”

Paddy Tipping: “The Police, Crime, Courts and Sentencing Bill is comprehensive. It will take at least a year to work it’s way through Parliament. There are some strong proposals in it, but it says nothing about violence against women and girls.  

The proposals that limit proposals are a real concern and the Home Office is already aware of my opposition. I’m already working with colleagues to amend and improve the Bill.  

Nottinghamshire has a good record when it comes to protests. Both last year’s BLM protest and the local ‘Kill the Bill’ protests passed without incident. The police worked closely with protest organisers and the city council to ensure that these were positive events.  

One of my favourite images is the contrast the photos of police officers restraining and arresting women on Clapham Common with the photo taken of a female Nottinghamshire Police Officer lighting a candle in memory of Sarah Everard at an event arranged by women at the Brian Clough statue.” 

 

David Watts: “The right to protest is vital in a democratic society. The police should not be used to try and take this away. The policing bill is the single worst piece of legislation presented to the houses of parliament in the last 200 years. If elected I have no intention of allowing the police to be used as a tool of repression or of restricting the right to protest. Peaceful protest is vital for democracy to work.”


Filed Under: Campaigning

Issues Paper Spring 2021: “Mental health is the primary issue”

14 April 2021


Issues paper Spring 2021 - Website_Twitter_FB_LinkedIn.png

Nottingham Women’s Centre is a charity and community space that empowers women by providing financial and employment support, counselling, training, social activities and activism in a women’s building in central Nottingham. Before lockdown measures were imposed, around 250 women came to the Women’s Centre every week. We are now supporting similar numbers over the phone and online.  

Our staff and volunteers have supported many women facing crisis during Covid-19. It’s a difficult time for everyone at the moment, but it’s been especially hard for women who were already struggling with their mental health, poverty or discrimination. This blog is a summary of the main issues that have been highlighted by our caseworkers and management team, along with issues identified by our local ‘Communities of Identity’ funding partners, POW and Women’s Resource Centre.

This paper can be downloaded in full here and is compiled by our Policy and Influencing Officer, please send any feedback or comments to: katie@nottinghamwomenscentre.com. 


Mental Health Crisis

“Mental health is the primary issue for our young people”

– Communities of Identity Funding Partner 

Women and girls from a wide range of backgrounds across Nottingham have reported increased mental distress due to bereavements, isolation and Covid restrictions. Co-ordinators for groups supporting Muslim women, young people, sex workers and trans women have reported mental health issues as the primary concern for their community members. 
Research by the international charity CARE has also highlighted the global disparities between men and women’s experiences of Covid-related mental health with 27% of women reporting increased mental illness since the start of the pandemic compared to 10% of men.

“The main issue impacting our service users is social isolation, especially for women living alone. Some have been furloughed and struggled to survive on less hours or less pay, which has affected their mental health. They were worried about feeding children at lunchtime while kids were off school isolating due to Covid cases in their classes, and during school holidays. We are aware that ourselves and other organisations need to be even more aware of people’s mental situations caused by events over the last year. For those women already on an unsteady path Covid has rocked them and they have no or very little support. A lot of the women we speak with do not want to go back to the doctor and get labelled with the stigma of mental health.”

– Building Bridges, Breaking Barriers (Communities of Identity Funding Partner)

“The main issues have been not able to do any activities hence women are being isolated and losing confidence but we are trying to support and help women in any way we can by doing packed lunches and to help them to stay positive and gain confidence and live a healthy life for we do cook healthy lunches”

– Muslim Women’s Group (Communities of Identity Funding Partner)


The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill 

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill is a huge piece of legislation which proposes major changes to Government policies relating to crime and justice, including protests. We are acutely aware of how many women’s rights have been won through non-violent direct action and are therefore are deeply concerned about the new protest restrictions.

Currently the police can impose specific measures on the routes of marches and put restrictions on protests that may result in “serious public disorder, serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community“. The Policing Bill will allow Police chiefs to put more conditions on rallies such as imposing a start and finish time and setting noise limits. Offices will also be able to fine individuals up to £2,500 if they refuse to follow Police directions. These restrictions are designed to prevent the occupation of public spaces and other forms of nonviolent direct action. 

More than 150 rights organisations including Liberty, End Violence Against Women Coalition and Unite have co-signed a letter to Home Secretary, Priti Patel, and Justice Secretary, Robert Buckland, warning that the legislation would be “an attack on some of the most fundamental rights of citizens” and have asked the government to “fundamentally rethink its approach”.


Legacy benefits 

Some of our clients are concerned and angry as they have been excluded from the £20 Benefits uplift announced by Chancellor, Rishi Sunak, in the latest budget because they have remained on ‘legacy benefits’. An estimated 1.9 million disabled people will miss out on the £20-a-week payments which has led to two disabled people launching legal action against the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).

Some of our clients have chosen to stay on ‘legacy benefits’ (e.g. ESA and Child Tax Credit) rather than move over to Universal Credit system for a wide range of reasons such as: UC usually being paid monthly rather than fortnightly, payment amounts perceived as being less predictable, and concerns about the five week delay between an application for UC and receiving the first payment. 

Women who do choose to switch to UC may be entitled to an ‘advance payment’ loan, which can be taken out at the start of the five weeks but many women fear they will not be able to survive on the reduced level of benefit paid while repaying the loan. 

There are different rules around savings, earnings and eligibility for UC and the £20 uplift is only guaranteed until September. Longer term this means some women may be worse off switching, and it’s not possible to ‘switch back’ to legacy benefits. The finance blog MoneySavingExpert says “as rough guidelines, those who are better off (on UC) are typically those who pay private rents in expensive cities. Those who might be worse off are those with disabilities.”

Our caseworkers have noted that, on average, women are paid 10% less on UC in comparison to legacy benefits. It’s understandable why some women do not want to switch, but we do not believe it’s fair that they have been excluded from the £20 benefits uplift.


Gypsy, Traveller and Roma Women in the Criminal Justice System

New research by The Traveller Movement reports that Gypsy, Roma and Traveller (GRT) women are shockingly overrepresented in the Criminal Justice system, forming approximately 6% of the prison population and yet just 0.1% of the general population. This is even higher at the women’s prison in Derbyshire (HMP Foston Hall) where at least 9% of women self-identify as Gypsy/Irish Traveller. The Traveller Movement demonstrates how GRT people are routinely discriminated against by the police and therefore have poor outcomes throughout the justice system, contributing to this overrepresentation. 

‘Gypsy, Roma and Traveller Women in Prison’ calls for policymakers to implement a series of recommendations, including:

  1. A call for increase in the use of Out Of Court Disposals (OOCDs) for Gypsy, Roma and Traveller Women, and also for consistent ethnic monitoring to capture how these are implemented by the Police. 

  2. A call for more integrated sentencing plans to better support GRT women upon their release.

  3. Prisons need to become trauma-informed spaces, and HMPPS should commission providers with expertise in Domestic Abuse and Adverse Childhood Experiences to develop a better understanding of the intersecting needs of GRT women.

  4. Roma ethnicity must be introduced into ethnic monitoring by Criminal Justice organisations to allow the experiences of Roma women to be better recorded and better included in calls for reform.


Problems with Unpaid Work Orders

Unpaid Work Orders are community orders or suspended sentences where people are obliged to carry out between 40 and 300 hours of unpaid work, usually at a charity or community project.

Some women haven’t been able to complete Unpaid Work Orders during Covid restrictions because charities have either closed their premises and activities or have been overwhelmed with work and unable to take on extra responsibilities. The Orders are time-limited by court, which has led to some women’s Orders expiring before they have been given the opportunity to complete them. 

We know that a clear end date for court orders, and all forms of punishment, are really important for women’s rehabilitation and mental health. However, rather than allowing women to move on with their lives, some courts have extended court Unpaid Work Orders by a further 6 to 12 months. This has left some women feeling distressed and frustrated, which has led to some women mounting legal challenges against the extension as other types of orders have not been extended. 


Rise of online sex work

There are growing numbers of women offering online sex work. Research by the sex workers organisation, POW Nottingham, has highlighted a new community of online sex workers, mostly consisting of young women, working on the platform OnlyFans.

Even though these women don’t necessarily identify with the term ‘sex worker’, they can experience risks relating to sex work including: harassment, outing, and stalking.

The research also found that street and off-street sex workers have generally not moved online. This could be due to digital exclusion, language barriers or lack of marketing or technological skills.


Download the full Spring 2021 Issues Paper here

Filed Under: Campaigning, Issues Papers

Our evidence submission for the Gender Recognition Act inquiry

17 March 2021

Nottingham Women’s Centre is proud to be a trans-inclusive women’s organisation. You can read more about our trans-inclusion policy, in line with our commitment to anti-oppressive and anti-discriminatory practices, here.

We recently drafted evidence for the Women and Equalities Committee Inquiry into the Gender Recognition Act which you can read in full here. This evidence was based on feedback from some of our transgender service users, as well as our staff’s experience of running a trans-inclusive women’s organisation for many year’s now.

We also consulted with three local partners which offer support, campaigns and advice to Nottingham’s trans community: Notts Trans Hub, TRANS4ME and Nottingham Chameleons.

This evidence submission presents information about our trans-inclusion policy and the day-to-day realities of being a trans-inclusive women’s organisation. We have also provided information and case studies about the barriers many trans people face when accessing services, including:

  • Misgendering and problems updating official records
  • Issues with Equality and Inclusion Forms 
  • Problems with the language used to describe women’s services
  • Issues with accessing toilets
  • Long waiting times to access transition-related healthcare
  • Digital exclusion and isolation
  • Smear tests for non-binary people and trans men

We also discuss the interaction between the Gender Recognition Act 2004 and the Equality Act 2010 and suggest that the Government needs to take a more proactive approach to tackling the misinformation regarding the impact of GRA on the Equality Act.

You can read our full GRA submission by clicking the button below.

Read our full GRA evidence enquiry

Filed Under: Campaigning, Partner news

POW Nottingham’s response to the ‘Sexual Exploitation’ Bill

1 February 2021

Our Policy & Influencing Officer, Katie, has been working with POW Nottingham to write a response to the new ‘Sexual Exploitation’ Bill 2019-21 which will be debated in Parliament on 5th February 2021.

This statement outlines how, rather than protecting vulnerable individuals engaged in sex work, the Bill would cause considerable danger to sex workers by:

  • Pushing their work ‘underground’
  • Criminalising some of the safeguarding measures that currently exist
  • Compromising relationships with the Police
  • Creating an environment where services would be cheaper and home visits would become more regular
  • Making life much harder for migrant sex workers.

Keep on reading for POW’s full statement on the proposed Bill and if you have any questions or feedback, please email: katie@nottinghamwomenscentre.com

Download POW Nottingham’s response to the Sexual Exploitation Bill

About POW Nottingham

POW Nottingham is a specialist organisation that has been supporting sex workers in Nottinghamshire[1] since 1990. We are writing this statement in response to the ‘Sexual Exploitation’ Bill, which was proposed by Labour MP Diana Johnson and passed its first reading in Parliament in December 2020. With over thirty years’ experience of supporting sex workers, we feel able to give an informed opinion about how the changes outlined in the ‘Sexual Exploitation’ Bill would impact sex workers in Nottingham, and across the UK.

The ‘Sexual Exploitation’ Bill claims to tackle sex trafficking by criminalising the buying of sex and banning the advertisement of sexual services. This approach is known as the ‘Nordic Model’ and has been implemented in a number of European countries. We believe this Bill and the ‘Nordic Model’ lack nuance and conflate two separate issues: sex trafficking and sex work. Rather than protecting vulnerable individuals engaged in sex work, we believe this Bill would cause considerable danger to our service users by pushing their work ‘underground’ and criminalising some of the safeguarding measures that currently exist.


The Bill would remove existing safeguards

Criminalising platforms

The Bill seeks to criminalise online platforms where sex workers can safely advertise and screen clients. Many of our service users advertise through the websites Viva Street and AdultWork, both of which have inbuilt safeguards and administrators who can take action on safeguarding issues. For example, administrators check for unsafe ‘key words’ in advertisements and work with the Police if there are reports of suspected coercion/trafficking.

Under the proposed law these websites would close, which would force sex workers to advertise through underground networks and the ‘dark web’. This would be less safe and give them considerably less autonomy and control over their work. Under current legislation, sex workers can be self-employed and have their own site/advertising profile, which gives them total control of their work and boundaries.

Screening punters

    Criminalising the buyer would make it harder for sex workers to screen “punters” – their clients – because of security issues on the clients’ side. It’s likely that punters would switch between sim cards and refuse to disclose their real numbers for fear of prosecution. This could make it harder for sex workers to identify potential clients, which could lead to unsafe individuals accessing sex workers and a rise in violence against sex workers.

    Banning safeguarding initiatives

      There are a number of initiatives that effectively share information about potentially unsafe clients, such as Ugly Mugs. These initiatives would presumably be closed under the new Bill, which would cause alarm for our organisation and the sex working community. Initiatives such as Ugly Mugs provide much-needed protection for sex workers and literally save lives.


      The Bill would compromise relationships with the Police

      As well as removing existing safeguards, the Bill would drive sex work ‘underground’ and increase stigmatisation. This would severely impact those with complex needs who need intensive support from statutory services and support organisations such as ours.

      We have spent many years carefully building trusting relationships between our service users and the Police. The ‘Sexual Exploitation’ Bill could undo much of this work overnight by creating an atmosphere of suspicion and fear. A change in law could also change POW’s relationship with the Police and compromise the good working relationship that’s currently in place.

      Evidence from countries that use the ‘Nordic Model’ (e.g. France, Sweden and Canada) has shown that client criminalisation increases stigma against sex workers when they access service provision[2]. Stigma is one of main barriers for sex workers to accessing support and the Bill would increase the stigma.


      The Bill could lead to cheaper services and more home visits

      Criminalising the buying of sex would make punters more nervous about accessing sexual services. This could reduce the number of punters, which would push down prices for sexual services and cause further poverty and hardship for sex workers who rely on the income.

      Criminalisation of clients could also lead to an increased number of ‘home visits’, where sex workers would visit the punters at their home address or hotel. This would be particularly concerning within the context of the Covid-19 pandemic as it could compromise the health and safety of sex workers.


      Life would be harder for migrant sex workers

      The ‘hostile environment’ immigration policies deny many migrants access to social security payments, such as Universal Credit or housing benefit, which makes their lives particularly precarious. The regulation of sex work often is a migration issue as many migrant sex workers are reported to the Home Office.

      The price of sexual services have already dropped for many migrant sex workers because of fears around Brexit, less punters wanting to obtain services from migrants, and punters threatening to report undocumented sex workers to the Home Office. The further criminalisation of sex work would make migrant sex workers more vulnerable to exploitation and make it harder for sex workers to rent the houses for work. Changing the law would also compromise migrant sex workers trust in statutory services, the Police and organisations like POW for fear of criminalisation and deportation.


      The Bill presumes sex workers are ‘vulnerable women’

      We believe the Bill is overly focused on sex workers being ‘vulnerable women and girls’, when we know that individuals with a range of identities are sex workers[3]. Many sex workers are male, Transgender, queer, disabled and/or people of colour who would not fit into a stereotypical sex worker image. We believe the Bill ignores the complexities of the sex work community and erases individuals who chose sex work as a form of income.


      The Bill denies voluntary sex work

      Our final, and potentially most important, point is that voluntary and consensual sex work exists. The ‘Sexual Exploitation’ Bill denies individuals agency over their bodies and livelihoods, and presumes that all sex workers are the same. The Bill is moralising and proposes inappropriate measures that would endanger our service users and compromise their livelihoods.


      [1] According to the latest estimates, there are around 72,800 sex workers in Britain. Nottingham is the home to around 100 ‘on street’ sex workers and approximately 1000 ‘online’ sex workers.

      [2] https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/beyond-trafficking-and-slavery/long-read-how-nordic-model-france-changed-everything-sex-workers/

      [3] https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmhaff/26/26.pdf


      Filed Under: Campaigning, Community, Partner news, Statements & press releases

      Issues Paper Winter 2020/21: “It’s hard to know what’s true anymore”

      12 January 2021

      Issues impacting women in Nottingham during Covid-19 (Winter 2020/21)

      Nottingham Women’s Centre (NWC) is a charity and community space that empowers women by providing financial and employment support, counselling, training, social activities and activism in a women’s building in central Nottingham. Before lockdown measures were imposed, around 600 women came to the Women’s Centre every week[1]. We are now supporting similar numbers over the phone and online. 

      Our staff and volunteers have supported many women facing crisis during Covid-19. It’s a difficult time for everyone at the moment, but it’s been especially hard for women who were already struggling with their mental health, poverty or discrimination.

      This blog is a summary of the main issues that have been highlighted by our caseworkers and management team, along with information from two focus groups: our quarterly feedback focus group ‘V.I.E.W’, and one specifically regarding misinformation held with Nadia Whittome MP.

      Click to download this Issues Paper

      1. Misinformation

      Caseworkers have reported a notable rise in the amount of misinformation and conspiracy theories within since the pandemic started. Misinformation has rapidly spread through social media networks (e.g. WhatsApp and closed Facebook groups) and has become normalised. This could pose a threat to public health as the misinformation generally creates mistrust in the Government and the medical establishment, and creates tension between racialized groups.

      Reported conspiracy theories include false information on the following topics:

      5G internet causes Covid-19; the pandemic has been planned by either the Chinese Government or Bill Gates; drug companies want to depopulate the planet; vaccinations are harmful and/or being used to ‘track’ individuals; an explosion in Beirut was set-up by the Government; white British people’s cultures are being ‘erased’; there’s a plan to ethnically cleanse black people through Black Lives Matter protests.

      The history of oppression and violence against racially minoritised communities fuels many of these conspiracy theories. Our caseworkers have noted that misinformation and conspiracy theories are particularly common in communities where English is the second language.

      During our focus group on misinformation, it was noted that scientific information is often inaccessible due to the technical language used, whereas misinformation spreads widely because it uses plain language and more accessible formats, such as audio files or memes. It was also noted that far-right organisations are attaching themselves to legitimate campaigns such as anti-child exploitation and veteran’s rights to promote their own agenda of racial segregation.

      Change needed:

      Women in our focus group want shareable and easy-to-understand online materials that;

      1. Explain how to identify misinformation
      2. Actively dispute specific conspiracy theories
      3. These online materials also need to be available in multiple languages.

      Women also want community leaders and doctors to be vocal about getting the Covid-19 vaccine themselves to reassure people that it’s safe. For example, Nadia Whittome MP confirmed that she would be taking the vaccine.  Testimonies from already trusted community leaders would be the most powerful, as new conspiracy theories may form around high profile politicians and celebrities having the vaccine (e.g. that they were taking a fake vaccination).


      2. Transphobia

      Transphobic hate crimes have quadrupled since 2015[2]. Recent research found that 60% of trans people had experienced transphobia online and more than 50% had experienced transphobia in the street[3]. This is partly due patriarchal gender norms, the hostile online ‘debate’ around updating the Gender Recognition Act (GRA), and anti-trans sentiments expressed by politicians such as Donald Trump.

      We are proud to be a trans-inclusive women’s centre. The Board of NWC ratified our trans-inclusion policy[4] on 1st June 1998, although trans women were accessing the women’s centre for many years before that date. Contrary to some populist commentators, trans women have been a valued part of our community for many years and including trans women in our services hasn’t caused any internal issues. The only problem has been abuse from anti-trans activists over social media and the phone. This abuse has impacted our staff and volunteers’ mental health and increased our workloads.

      The Women and Equalities Committee (a cross-party group of MPs who are selected to hold the Government to account regarding women and equalities) launched an Inquiry in November to investigate the Government’s handling of changes to the GRA. Our Policy Officer submitted evidence to the Inquiry based on information from NWC staff, volunteers and service users, as well as Notts Trans Hub, TRANS4ME and Nottingham Chameleons. We will publish the evidence in full on our website in the new year, but here’s a quick summary of some of the key barriers experienced by Trans people when accessing services in Nottingham:

      1. Misgendering and problems with updating official records

      Trans people, particularly non-binary people, have reported experiencing misgendering from reception staff and frontline staff when accessing support services, who do not respect their correct pronouns. This can have a detrimental impact on trans people’s mental health and sense of safety, as well as compromise service users’ privacy.

      There are also many reports of support services taking a long time or making it difficult to update official records to reflect a trans person’s gender identity. For example, young trans people have to put their ‘deadname’ (the name they were given at birth, that they no longer use) on their exam papers. This causes extra stress and anxiety during exams.

      2. Outdated Equality and Inclusion Forms 

      Equality and Diversity forms often do not offer a full range of genders, which results in data being lost because it’s not being collected. For example, non-binary people are forced to select ‘Would rather not say’ or ‘Other’. This leaves non-binary people feeling invisible and being erased from Equality and Diversity data and research. One of our non-binary partners remarked: “One day I hope I have the absolute joy of being identified as myself… I’d love to be identified as X”

      3. Anxiety accessing services with ‘women’ in name

      Trans people have reported feeling anxious about accessing services that have ‘woman’ in the title as they are concerned about potential hostility from anti-trans activists, even if they have a legal right to access those services. This is clearly concerning as trans women are at heightened risk of domestic and sexual violence. For example, Stonewall and YouGov’s research[5] found that 16% of trans women had experienced domestic violence in the last 12 months (whereas 7.5% of cis-bodied women had experienced domestic violence in the same period[6]).

      4. Issues with safely accessing toilets

      Our trans partners reported multiple issues with accessing public toilets. Most of these issues stemmed from a lack of gender neutral toilets, which led trans people to being confronted or challenged in the toilet and accused of being in the ‘wrong gender’ toilet. For example; “My daughter had an issue in the council-run toilet where the attendant challenged her in the public loos. Also her college made her use the disabled toilets.”

      5. Digital exclusion and extreme isolation

      A lot of the people talking about trans issues are tech competent, young, middle class people with resources that allow them to access support for being trans. Those who are working class and don’t have access to tech may struggle to access resources, services and experience increased risk of isolation, which is highly likely to impact that persons mental health.


      3. Women with limited leave to remain and/or no recourse to public funds

      We are supporting a number of women with no recourse to public funds or limited leave to remain in the UK. These women may have children who were born in the UK, but have to reapply for a visa every 2.5 years to stay with their children. The process of applying for a visa is costly and stressful, and involves the following charges:

      • The cost of the visa, along with a biometric residence permit: £2208
      • An upfront payment of NHS charges for the 2.5 years: £1560
      • Solicitor’s fees: approx. £700 – £800
      • The costs associated with visa renewal, which includes at least one in-person attendance at a centre (the nearest are in Manchester and Birmingham): approx. £30

      This totals approximately £4,500 every 2.5 years, which is 521 hours’ work on minimum wage before paying for basic living costs.

      Although use of a solicitor is optional, the women reported that attempting to do the application without a solicitor can be very hazardous. If the Home Office is unable to contact them directly they may decide that the application is fraudulent and dismiss it. In these circumstances fees may not be refunded. Using a solicitor means not only that all the forms will be checked but also that they will handle any queries by the Home Office and make sure that the responses are accurate. Most of the women felt that the extra charges involved were worth paying.

      The visa process is not only very expensive but also highly stressful. It’s a threat to their right to remain in the UK if they make a mistake or the Home Office decides that they have made a mistake or that their application is not genuine. Two of the women we are supporting have incurred substantial debts trying to challenge Home Office decisions in the past. While they are on the 2.5 year visa they may have no recourse to public funds and therefore may not be eligible for any benefits including child benefits. If they don’t get a visa at all, they are unable to work.

      After 10 years of being granted temporary visas, these women will be eligible to apply for indefinite leave to remain.

      Change needed:

      We would like to be able to offer additional financial support to women with no recourse to public funds who are on very low incomes. We would be open to suggestions about where to access such funding.

      We would also like to join or support campaigns that are working to reduce the stress and/or cost of the visa process for women with no recourse to public funds. For example, campaigning for low cost legal support, local arrangements for obtaining biometric cards, as well as bigger campaigns around visa fees/renewal times.


      4. Housing

      Research from the Women’s Budget Group[7] reveals a huge gender disparity in housing. Women’s housing tends to be of a lower standard than men’s in terms of affordability, ownership, safety and overcrowding. On average, women who privately rent spend 43% of their earnings on housing whereas men who privately rent spend 28%. Also the median home in England costs over 12 times women’s median wages, whereas it’s 8 times men’s median wage.

      Issues with housing association accommodation have been raised by NWC caseworkers. Six of our current service users have been moved into housing association accommodation without basic flooring, decoration or white goods. The lack of carpet, laminate or wooden flooring makes houses unsafe for young children, particularly those that crawl, and the lack of clean decoration has impacted women’s confidence and wellbeing.

      Change needed:

      We would like housing associations to provide clean flooring as part of their basic ‘offer’ to new tenants, especially those who are particularly vulnerable such as women who have recently left a domestic violence refuge and/or those with small children.

      We would also be open to joining campaigns that challenge high private rental costs for women.


      5. Other issues reported through our partnerships

      Women’s casual work

      Many women rely on casual ‘cash in hand’ work such as catering jobs, cleaning, dog walking and child minding. Much of this work is no longer available because of Covid-related changes and restrictions. For example, a group of women cater for small events for cash, which enables them to pool their resources, socialise and have a small amount of financial independence. They haven’t been able to form a legal entity because their husbands disapprove so it’s been hard to get support during the pandemic and continue with their activities.

       

      Rise in violence against sex workers

      Our partners at POW who support sex workers in Nottingham said “We saw a rise in violence against our client base since the beginning of lockdown which has added another layer of complexity for some of the most complex people and disenfranchised people within the city”. A Bill regarding the legality of buying sex has passed its first reading in Parliament so we are expecting to cover this topic in greater detail in January 2021.

       

      Covid-related scams

      Caseworkers have reported that women have been approached over social media for ‘school funding’, which is actually a scam that asks women to hand over their bank details in exchange for a ‘free’ £70. Another scam tells women that a free £200 supermarket voucher is available for single mothers, if they provide their bank details.

       

      Isolation and poor mental health

      This continues to be a major issue. Many groups we work with, including trans support groups and Muslim women support groups, have reported isolation as being a huge issue with their service users.

       

      Volunteer burnout

      There are many community and ‘grassroots’ organisations that are run by 1 – 2 volunteers who are offering vital support to a whole community of women in Nottingham. We support many of these groups through our Communities of Identity funding, in partnership with Nottingham City Council. These volunteers have often experienced a rise in demand and work, but also more pressure on them as individuals, which is leading to ‘burnout’ and exhaustion. More funding and support is needed for these community leaders so they can continue to offer support through their organisations.

       

      This document was compiled by our Policy and Influencing Officer. If you have any questions or feedback, please email Katie@nottinghamwomenscentre.com.

       


      Footnotes:

      [1] From April 2019 to March 2020 almost 600 women came through our door each week, 800 women participated in our courses and activities, 125 women accessed our counselling service and 70 volunteers were involved with the Centre.

      [2] https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/10/14/hate-crime-england-wales-police-record-transphobia-homophobia-lgbt-home-office/

      [3] http://www.galop.org.uk/transphobic-hate-crime-report-2020/

      [4] https://www.nottinghamwomenscentre.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Trans-inclusion-policy-2017.pdf

      [5] https://www.stonewall.org.uk/sites/default/files/lgbt_in_britain_home_and_communities.pdf

      [6] https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/domesticabusefindingsfromthecrimesurveyforenglandandwales/yearendingmarch2017

      [7] https://wbg.org.uk/analysis/reports/a-home-of-her-own-housing-and-women/

      Filed Under: Campaigning, Issues Papers

      Power to the Women Panel: Environmental Activism

      26 October 2020

      On Sunday 11th October, Nottingham Women’s Centre hosted our sixth Power to the Women event, open for any self-identifying women in Nottingham. On this occasion, the event took place on Zoom due to COVID-19 restrictions. A recording of the session is still available to watch here via Facebook.

      Audience members had the opportunity to attend an online panel followed by an interactive discussion; both focussed on environmental activism in the Nottingham area. Speakers on the panel were invited to talk about their own specialist approaches to environmental work and activism:

      • Nadia Whittome – Labour MP, Nottingham East
      • Sally Longford – Labour Councillor, Lenton and Wollaton East
      • Dr Sarah Gretton – Associate Professor, Natural Sciences Programme, Director at Uni of Leicester
      • Emma Lewis-Jones – Decolonise, Decarbonise, Under 30s fighting for global justice

      During the online panel our guests discussed the climate and ecological emergency, exploring what is being done in Nottingham, methods of engagement, and activism in the face of Covid-19.

      Click here to watch the panel

       

      Nottingham’s response to the climate crisis has included innovative projects such as the Carbon Neutral 2028 target and NCT Bio-Gas buses, with inspiring ongoing action taken by movements such as Decolonise Decarbonise, XR Nottingham, Youth Climate Strikers and workers’ strikes over climate. 

      Common themes raised by speakers during discussion were the importance of education and the creation of opportunities for more people to engage actively with the climate emergency. Sally Longford suggested finding ways for people to engage with their community using practical activities, such as the creation and use of community gardens and vegetable growing, bringing communities together and opening opportunities to learn about the environment. 

      When discussing the urgency of educating people on the scale of the climate crisis, Emma Lewis-Jones highlighted the lack of information provided by those in power, leading to low levels of public engagement and insufficient action taken by public bodies, such as schools, councils, governmental bodies, NGOs and charities:

      “A national, as well as a local effort to educate and to make clear what is happening, on a global scale, is what needs to happen most urgently.” 

      This need for engagement across wider audiences raised further discussion on how the climate crisis disproportionately impacts different social groups. Nadia Whittome stated:

      “As legislators, politicians and activists, we need to show how those issues are connected.” 

      With inequality and social injustice creating barriers for engagement, there was a clear agreement that there needs to be more focus on engaging with communities, working towards solving social issues such as mental health, housing and food inequalities to create space for more people to focus on climate change.

      Both speaking from backgrounds in environmental activism, Dr Sarah Gretton and Emma Lewis-Jones drew focus onto the positives that can come through environmentalism:

      “We can work to empower women to take action and to take to the streets” 

      Nadia Whittome also spoke about the importance of having women at the centre of a green recovery plan. There was further emphasis on the importance of investing in the care sector, thus creating 2 million green jobs. This would not only help to close the gender employment gap but would simultaneously address both the social care crisis and the climate crisis simultaneously:

      Against the background of a global pandemic, with Nottingham having the highest infection rate in the UK (BBC News), speakers were asked how we can rebuild after Covid-19 in a way that also tackles the climate emergency.

      With further emphasis on how environmental jobs and investment, especially into the care sector, can help with the climate emergency, Nadia speaks of “reimagining democracy”, with increased need for climate assemblies and climate-aware trade union branches.  

      Working in virology (the study of viruses), Dr Sarah Gretton spoke of the inevitability of this, and future, pandemics but also addressed how quickly different industries and individuals adapted to the pandemic. Our Government’s ability to react quickly to this crisis (Covid-19) demonstrates our capability to address the climate crisis.

      Sarah also credited the work of environmental activists, which has been crucial in getting us to where we are today:

      “To have a Conservative government that is mentioning ‘green’ deal as part of a recovery, is important.” 

       

      Although the lockdown period provided many of us with time to self-educate and reflect on issues such as climate change, Covid-19 has generated a huge amount of argument and discussion, both in parliament and in the media, leaving people feeling overwhelmed with other social responsibilities. 

      Many enlightening ideas were shared at the event, drawing attention to required changes in the public sector, such as investment in both education and community sectors and the creation of ‘green jobs’, as part of a ‘green recovery’.

      During the interactive session, participants considered their own relationships with the environment and ways in which our lifestyles can be adapted to help combat climate change. The importance for individuals to continue engaging with activism lies clear, and for women especially, to utilise their voices in targeting the government, local councils and corporate bodies with hope of saving the planet. 

       

      “Pandemic is a symptom of a world consumed by greed and growth. We need to rethink a system that benefits communities and nature, and dismantle capitalism”

      Emma Lewis-Jones

      Useful Links

      • Read about Nottingham becoming Carbon Neutral by 2028 here.
      • Read Nadia on… The Climate Crisis – a regular column in the LeftLion here.
      • Find out more about the Women’s Budget Group here.
      • Find out more about the Climate and Ecological Emergency (CEE) Bill here.
      • Find out more about the UK100 here.
      • Read The Impact of COVID19 on the Environment: Observations and Insights here.

      Get Involved

      • Follow Decolonise, Decarbonise: Nottingham’s under 30s fighting climate injustice + anti-racist allies of the global south on Instagram here.
      • Find out more about XR Nottingham here.

      Contact

      • Sally Longford: sally.longford@nottinghamcity.gov.uk
      • Emma Lewis-Jones: Instagram and Twitter: @emmalewj
      • Nadia Whittome: Instagram and Twitter @nadiawhittomemp

       

      Event curated by, and this post written by: Flora Lewis-Jones

      Filed Under: Campaigning, Events

      ‘There’s No Food’ – Issues Impacting Women in Nottingham during Lockdown

      28 May 2020

      Staff and volunteers at Nottingham Women’s Centre (NWC) have been supporting many women facing crisis during lockdown. It’s a difficult time for everyone at the moment, but it’s been especially hard for women who were already struggling with their mental health, poverty or discrimination.

      We’ve been monitoring the issues impacting women that come into contact with us and our partners, and regularly sending briefings to local decision makers about what support is needed at a policy level. We’re pleased to have successfully worked in partnership with Alex Norris MP, Nottingham City Council (NCC) and Wider Nottingham Clinical Commissioning Group to take action on school places for vulnerable children and improve communications around medication changes for women who cannot read.

      This blog is based on those briefings and should give you an understanding of the main issues that women are struggling with in Nottingham.

       

      Issue: Women not having access to food

      “A client messaged our Facebook page requesting a food bank voucher. She had no money, no transport and a small baby with no pram and was in desperation”

      We have seen a marked increase in the number of women asking for foodbank vouchers and food parcels. Food Banks were initially struggling to stay open because of a lack of volunteers, which complicated the process of referring women to them. Food Banks also assign a limited number of vouchers to each person, which has resulted in some women going without enough food.

      NWC has been able to help some women in crisis, but this is not sustainable as we do not have the funding or infrastructure for this work. We are asking Food Banks to be flexible about how many vouchers they can assign to each woman and highlighting the need for more food bank funding to NCC and Government.

       

      Issue: Decline in Women’s Mental health

      The main reoccurring issue has been a huge decline in women’s mental health. For the women we’ve been in contact with, there have been the following trends and issues:

      • Marked increase in suicidal thoughts, calls to Crisis teams and Samaritans.
      • Marked increase in self harm including cutting, burning and excessive hand washing causing injury
      • Severe increase in anxiety exacerbating obsessive compulsive symptoms and paranoia
      • Development of agoraphobic type symptoms
      • A ‘reversal’ in recovery progress for pre-existing conditions, depression, complicated grief, post-traumatic stress
      • Pressure of home schooling/lack of childcare support leading to anxiety, insomnia

      NWC’s counselling service is still operating online for existing clients and we are carrying out wellbeing checks for our most vulnerable clients, which are appreciated. Plus our Peer Support Mental health group has moved online since lockdown, meeting on Zoom once a week. We are also signposting women in crisis to Notts Healthcare Trust helpline and other local voluntary sector support, but we are all running on short term funding.

      We believe there is a major mental health crisis on the horizon and a second epidemic is around the corner: a mental health epidemic. We are calling for increased and longer term funding for mental health services in Nottingham, especially trauma-informed and gender sensitive services that effectively serve the most vulnerable in our city.

      Nearly all mental health support is now online or over the phone, which is a barrier to accessing support for women who do not have access to a laptop, tablet or an internet connection. This leads us to our next issue.

       

      Issue: Women not having resources such as Wifi and laptops

      “A client who has recently fled domestic violence is unable to access mental health support, such as our online Peer Support group, as she doesn’t have access to wifi or the funds to pay for mobile data to access the internet.”

      Some women don’t have access to the internet, or they lack the appropriate technology (laptop, tablet or smartphone). In the current climate this makes them totally isolated from their support networks and unable to access mental health support, information about benefits or educational courses. This also impacts the home-learning capacities of those families without appropriate technology and/or access to the internet.

      “A client wants to join an online course which would help her get a place in college, but she hasn’t got a laptop or the funds to buy one.”

      We are advocating that vulnerable women should have access to the appropriate technology and/or internet for an affordable price or for free. Already vulnerable women are being further disadvantaged and isolated because they are digitally excluded from our society, which is even more sharply felt during the epidemic. The simple intervention of a preloaded dongle or being lent a laptop would make a tangible difference to a large proportion of the women who are accessing our services.

       

      Issue: Women being laid off or having a reduced salary due to Covid-19 and problems with the welfare system

      “One woman who was laid off from her job in a hotel in Nottingham has a baby and is a single parent. She has been struggling to access food, baby milk and clothes for herself.”

      A large number of our clients have been laid off or had their salaries reduced due to Covid-19. This is leaving women financially reliant on Universal Credit or family members. The monthly assessment period for UC means that women are forced to manage on a small amount of money for a long period of time, and they have a whole month of uncertainty about what they will get next time. Some clients have been very uncertain about whether they are going to get Statutory Sick Pay, how much is the correct amount, or how to check it.

      NWC can provide food bank and clothes bank vouchers, but this is not enough. We are asking for the development of emergency hardship grants for women to support those in financial crisis because of Covid-19.

       

      Issue: Increase in Domestic Violence

      There has been an increase in the number of women we refer to Nottingham’s specialist domestic violence organisation Juno Women’s Aid, which normally runs from Nottingham Women’s Centre but is currently functioning remotely. There has been a 25% increase in calls to the National Domestic Abuse Helpline since the lockdown started.

      Juno Women’s Aid and Women’s Aid UK are better positioned to understand the needs and support required by the increasing number of survivors of domestic abuse – https://junowomensaid.org.uk/

       

      Issue: Parents of disabled children struggling without support

      Many women with vulnerable children are providing complex, round-the-clock care with no respite or outside help. Many have to cancel home carers’ services because of the lack of sufficient PPE or testing, and some are struggling to cope without family support.

      “One of our clients is dealing with multiple issues including low income, mental health conditions, and looking after small children – one child has severe learning disabilities. The client normally gets considerable help from her mother, but is unable to do so because her mother is shielding due to her own health condition.”

      What do our women need? PPE should be prioritised for carers and families with disabled children, and the impact of quarantine for women who rely on intergenerational family networks for caring and domestic support must be considered by policy makers and recovery planners.

       

      Issue: Child contact centres are closed

      Women who are currently going through family court proceedings and see their children at a Child Contact Centre are currently only allowed video contact. This is causing distress to some women. We have one client whose child’s foster parent won’t allow video calls so she can only speak to the children on the phone. In response to our clients’ needs, we are asking that Child Contact Centres are prioritised for reopening as soon as possible.

       

       

      If you’re interested in this work, please keep an eye on our website and social media and feel free to email our policy and influencing officer on Katie@nottinghamwomenscentre.com to join the policy mailing list.

      We have recently set up a new crisis fund for the women we are supporting. If you’re able to, please help us expand our crisis fund by donating through our new Local Giving page. Any donation small or large is really appreciated and will go directly to women in crisis.

       

      Filed Under: Campaigning, Issues Papers

      Barriers to Accessing Mental Health Services – Report and Our Response

      3 July 2019

      Nottingham Women’s Centre ran a focus group to collect the experiences of survivors of sexual violence and/or domestic violence who have accessed mental health services in Nottingham. The aim of the focus group was to identify the key barriers accessing mental health support after surviving domestic and/or sexual abuse in order to improve our services and shape our policy and campaigning work.

      Our response to the key findings and recommendations from the report can be found towards the end of this blog.

      Key findings

      1. There can be long waiting times to access NHS mental health services. 

      Some women waited up to six months for counselling and specialist sexual violence counselling.

      2. Mental health services can be poorly advertised. 

      Some mental health services are not well advertised and finding out how to access those services can be very challenging. This resulted in some women only becoming aware of the support that’s available once they are in crisis, even if the support is available in their neighbourhood and takes self-referrals.

      3. There’s a lack of support for women in crisis. 

      One woman was sent 150 miles away from Nottingham for emergency mental health support as there were no available beds locally. Most women experienced inadequate support from Crisis Teams and felt there was poor support after being discharged from inpatient mental health care.

      4. Women’s Centres can help women report domestic violence and sexual violence and build confidence through volunteering. 

      Women’s Centre can help identify DV/SV and support women to report. Further volunteering and training opportunities within the women’s sector were deemed an important part of some women’s journeys to healing and empowerment.

      5. Isolation can stop women from reaching out for help. 

      Isolation, anxiety, and/or depression were highlighted by nearly all the women as a major barrier to reporting; they can make women feel unable to leave the house, make contact with strangers or try anything new. This can make some Mental Health Support services inaccessible and stops some women from reporting abuse.

      6. Peer support groups 

      Peer support groups were identified as highly effective methods of support, from the initial helpline support to in-person support groups and ongoing volunteering opportunities.

      7. Historical mistrust of Police and social services

      There is some mistrust of Nottinghamshire Police and social services relating to historical mistreatment, although there’s an acknowledgement that Nottinghamshire Police and mental health services in general have considerably improved in recent years.

      8. Disability, age, and drug addiction can be barriers to accessing mental health services 

      Disabled women can struggle to access mental health services as they are isolated, older women can feel embarrassed or worried to ask for help. Drug addiction can be a major barrier to accessing the support that’s necessary for recovery and empowerment.

      9. Services didn’t always understand carers/supporters

      Some women felt that some mental health services were not equipped to support women with caring or ‘supporting’ responsibilities. For example, they felt mental health support professionals did not understand when they had to change their appointments at short notice because of the person they cared for/supported.


      Key recommendations based on findings

      Invest in mental health services to reduce waiting times for talking therapies

      Nearly all the focus group participants reported a delay in accessing talking therapy, which was a key part of their recovery. Women wanted further investment in talking therapies and mental health services in general, and they wanted the services to be better advertised so it’s easier to access talking therapies before crisis point.

      “Listen to us rather than make the decision for us, we don’t get any say”

      Continue to work to build trust with women through meaningful consultation with service users, transparent practices and acknowledgement of how things have gone wrong in the past.

      “Network support makes all the difference”  

      Continue funding and developing specialist peer support groups in relation to domestic violence and sexual violence, and continued development of volunteering opportunities as part of the recovery and empowerment. Isolation can be a major barrier to accessing support and help; Women’s Centres were flagged as a key part in women’s journeys from abuse to empowerment.

      “Start early”

      There’s was a lot of support for investing in early prevention. Working in schools “preparing girls to say no and preparing boys to respect girls”. The women wanted children to be taught what abusive and unhealthy relationships look like, how to deal with emotions and they wanted girls to have their self-worth built at school.


      Nottingham Women’s Centres’ response to the Recommendations

      Invest in MHS to reduce waiting times for talking therapies

      Renew aims to address the gap in services between women assessed as too ‘complex’ for primary mental health support such as IAPT (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies) services but also not considered high risk enough for referral to secondary mental health services.  Women are often referred to these services, with waiting times for each, only to discover that their needs do not match the service criteria.

      Even when appropriately referred, women are often waiting up to 18 months for treatment to start.

      Waiting time for a Renew counselling assessment is approx 8 weeks, clients are then allocated and typically offered a first counselling appointment within 4 weeks, sometimes faster if the client has flexible availability.

      Renew is aware of these difficulties in accessing services for all women but in particular those experiencing multiple disadvantage.  We have made a number of changes our referral processes and service provision to reflect this.

      • Simple, user led referral system – We no longer accept referrals from professionals and agencies, instead advocating signposting and self-referral. Women are welcome to attend the centre with a support worker if this makes access easier.  This is designed to improve waiting times but also to reduce cancellations and DNA’s Women take more ownership of their engagement with us when initiated by them and are more likely to engage.
      • Responding to need – We are flexible in our approach to need and offer a triage system. Clients who are experiencing crisis or have long histories of high risk and or/multiple disadvantage are offered short term work with experienced therapist while on the waiting list for long term counselling.  We are also able to offer them holistic support through wider services at the centre and respond immediately to crisis with caseworker support where needed.  Women can access supportive and therapeutic groups, courses and activities and drop in at any time.  We also have an access fund available on a discretionary basis which aims to address barriers women have in accessing counselling i.e. childcare, travel costs
      • Increased capacity – To address the high number of women seeking mental health support we have increased the counselling team, employing a large team of counsellors both paid and volunteer, with varying levels of approach and experience, allowing us to allocate according to need and manage higher risk clients. Many of our clients are seeking support whilst on waiting lists for other services such as NSVSS and Personality Disorder Network. We have increased our paid staff from one to three, allowing us to support a growing number of volunteers to safely work with the more complex presentations we are encountering due to the pressure on NHS services and resultant waiting times.

       “Listen to us rather than make the decision for us, we don’t get any say”

      Renew offers Humanistic counselling which differs greatly from the Cognitive Behavioural approaches which are available through GP referral such IAPT services.  We aim for this to be a transparent and collaborative process from the start which welcomes feedback and client involvement.  We ask for feedback as part of our assessment process, during the counselling process and at the end of counselling.

      Whilst being mindful of research fatigue and ethical practice, we offer a number of ways in which clients can participate in evaluation of our services.  Alongside NWC’s general service user feedback, Renew collects distance travelled measures and the opportunity to give case studies and ‘story based’ feedback.  We encourage a culture of accountability to our clients with robust complaints procedures and prompt response to enquiries. 

      We aim to have a centre wide group – ‘Friends of NWC’ which will be a vehicle for regular feedback on our performance and a place where women have used Renew can effect change to the service.

      “Network support makes all the difference”  

      • We deliver several peer support groups at the centre aimed at multiple disadvantage and mental health. While not exclusively DVSA focussed, the majority of our participants have experienced DVSA and have been signposted to us from other projects within the centre or from DVSA services.
      • We have good relationships with DVSA agencies and referral/signposting takes place in both directions, in line with our holistic approach to women’s needs.
      • We recognise the effects of isolation on mental health and are flexible in the ways that women can access our services. Our peer support coordinator offers one to one meetings prior to groups when appropriate to help settle anxiety and overcome barriers.  We signpost to wider NWC services for wraparound support wherever possible.
      • Our Peer Support and volunteer counsellors are offered regular DVSA training
      • We value lived experience and actively promote growth and development through peer support volunteering and an extensive volunteer programme

       “Start early”

      • Renew offers services to women aged 18 and over. We have good relationships with the Stronger Families Team who signpost women to our service upon completion of their programme which supports positive parenting and awareness of the effects of DVSA on children

      Case study:

      This story shows a woman’s journey from being in an abusive relationship to full recovery. This woman is now in full-time employment, feels empowered and happy again:

      “I was unemployed, living with an abusive partner, and feeling that I was” going crazy”.

      I had had depression in the past, but had stopped my medication some months before moving in with him, as I felt that I had recovered.

      I was new in Nottingham and had no friends, therefore I registered with a new GP and explained that I couldn’t understand what was happening with my mental health.

      After a few questions, he just suggested to give me some antidepressants. I didn’t accept and I self-referred myself to talking therapy with Insight, but the waiting time after the initial assessment was long. Again, they weren’t able to identify what my real problem was.

      Doing some internet research, I found the Women’s Centre address, and one day I just walked in and started crying not being able to talk.

      However, they gave me the space and time to calm down and talk about my feelings. Within the same day, the helped me understand that I was being psychologically abused and signposted me to Women’s Aid.

      I had a case worker who was very supportive and helped realised that I had to leave my partner. She was also very good at warning me that the violence could increase as I would try to leave him. Indeed, I had to report him to the Police for hitting me, and the Police escorted me to the flat we were living in, so that I could take my things safely.

      The Women’s Centre allowed me to join some activities, which helped me not to feel completely alone and isolated.

      I did some talking therapy and a few months later I could do long term counselling at the Women’s Centre.

      This was the key to my recovery and I can only talk about it thanks to all that process of healing and empowerment.”

      Filed Under: Campaigning, Centre news, Community

      Overwhelming public support for Nottinghamshire Police’s Misogyny Hate Crime Policy

      9 July 2018

      The University of Nottingham and Nottingham Trent University carried out a review of the impact of the misogyny hate crime policy introduced by Notts Police in April 2016. Results showed there is clear support for the policy from men and women in the general public, as well as victims who have reported. The overall recommendations call for the policy to be rolled out nationally alongside publicity to increase reporting and education to help change behaviours.

      Please follow this link to read the Misogyny Hate Crime Evaluation Exec Summary June 2018.

      The results also show that some members of the public (men and women) and the police viewed the term ‘misogyny’ as too elitist/academic and suggested ‘gender hate crime’ could be used instead. We do not support this approach for a number of reasons.

      We feel strongly that misogyny should be used as the key word to understand why certain behaviours are taking place and after taking evidence locally and nationally the Police chose this term too because of the need to recognise the way that women’s experiences differ to men’s (and within this to understand the overlap of misogyny into other forms of hate such as transphobia, anti-Muslim hate and homophobia). Misogyny hate crime is part of a continuum of violence specifically targeted against women and girls. The Police had been able to record gender hate crime for about a decade before the introduction of this policy yet very few reports were received so we believe this explicit identification is necessary to encourage women to report the hate crime they experience purely because of their gender.

      It’s also a public statement by a law enforcement agency that is saying misogynistic behaviour isn’t acceptable here. In Notts this has further empowered women to challenge inappropriate behaviour (when they feel safe to do so) as well generate lots of conversations about how we bring about further culture change.

      So we say stick with Misogyny Hate Crime – it’s working!

      Filed Under: Campaigning

      • « Go to Previous Page
      • Page 1
      • Page 2
      • Page 3

      Footer

      Find us

      Nottingham Women’s Centre
      30 Chaucer St
      Nottingham
      NG1 5LP

      Find us on Google maps

      Follow us

      • E-mail
      • Facebook
      • Instagram
      • LinkedIn
      • Threads
      • WhatsApp
      • YouTube
      • Spotify

      Contact us

      reception@nottinghamwomenscentre.com

      0115 9411475

      (Mon – Fri: 9am – 5pm)

       

      More!

      • Read our Policies and Procedures
      • Our Networks
      • Illustrations by Lucy Watts
      • Photos by Elizabeth Brown
      • Hosting by 34sp.com

      Copyright © 2025 Nottingham Women’s Centre • All rights reserved. • Charity Registration 1105837 • Company Limited by Guarantee 5113835, registered in England & Wales